Illustrative sample data — fictional members, bookings and payments invented to demonstrate the workflow. No real NZSIA member information is used.
Score a candidate
Candidate and course are pre-populated. Multiple examiners can score the same candidate; the panel scores are correlated and averaged.
- Technical skiing
- Teaching & lesson delivery
- Movement analysis
- Professional conduct· mandatory
- On-snow safety management· mandatory
Score every criterion to see the result.
Recent results
Signed-off results auto-update qualifications, certificates and the reporting view.
Candidates see their own results in the member portal.
Review past panels
Multi-examiner panels from Ski Level Two Certification, Coronet Peak (25 May – 1 Jun 2026). Each examiner scores independently; the panel then correlates marks and agrees a final before sign-off.
| Criterion | Mereana | Lukas | Priya | Mean | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical skiing | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4.7 | 1 |
| Bumps & variable terrain | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| Teaching methodology | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
| Movement analysis | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
The outlier rule (panel spread ≥ 2, examiner ≥ 1 from the mean) and the consensus rule are sensible defaults — we’ll set them to NZSIA’s real moderation process.
| Criterion | Mereana | Lukas | Priya | Mean | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical skiing | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| Bumps & variable terrain | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Teaching methodology | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4.3 | 1 |
| Movement analysis | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Outlier to discuss: Priya on Bumps & variable terrain. The rest of the panel is aligned.
Talk it through, then agree the final mark together — sign-off happens after the panel agrees.
The outlier rule (panel spread ≥ 2, examiner ≥ 1 from the mean) and the consensus rule are sensible defaults — we’ll set them to NZSIA’s real moderation process.
| Criterion | Mereana | Lukas | Priya | Mean | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical skiing | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2.7 | 1 |
| Bumps & variable terrain | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Teaching methodology | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| Movement analysis | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
The outlier rule (panel spread ≥ 2, examiner ≥ 1 from the mean) and the consensus rule are sensible defaults — we’ll set them to NZSIA’s real moderation process.
One panel above is in consensus; one diverges on a single criterion and is flagged for the panel to talk through. Once agreed, sign-off awards the qualification and certificate automatically.
Where scoring goes next
The scoring engine is built to grow with how NZSIA assesses.
The panel-moderation view above is a first cut. We can build this out to match exactly how you assess — for example a formal correlation/agreement step before sign-off, weighting senior examiners, benchmark standards per discipline and level, or how the “6 = exceptional” band is handled.
Tell us where you see scoring developing and we’ll shape this around it — that conversation is the next step.